Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Well that seals it. Those renowned "conservatives" (what? Conservative Maoists?) of MSNBC and Bloomberg News, having of course nothing but the best interests of the conservative movement and the USA in mind, have determined that National Review is out of line by pointing out that Trump is anything but a conservative. I guess that National Review will just have to fold its tent now that it has been vilified, crucified and even criticized (as Mayor Daley the Elder once complained) by those Olympians of conservatism and Americanism at MSNBC and Bloomberg.

National Review is disappointingly Establishmentarian since Bill Buckley's death but, on its worst day, its institutional wisdom is infinitely beyond MSNBC and Bloomberg. National Review CREATED the modern conservative movement sixty years ago and is a lot more invested than The Donald come lately and his sycophants.

11 posted on 01/22/2016 5:49:10 AM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline: Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society/Rack 'em Danno!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BlackElk

Invested in what? These people get paid to write- and to talk on TV. What have they ever accomplished? What have they ever done? I saw Dana Loesch on with Megyn Kelly - Dana admirably worked on TEA starting in 2010 but to pretend she has 60 years outside holding a sign in two degree weather working for Pete DuPont or Alan Keyes is a joke. Her TEA adventure is a now paid gig on Fox.


18 posted on 01/22/2016 6:08:36 AM PST by major-pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson