It was my response to the words you posted. If you were not posting Birtherism, I apologize, but your post suggests Birtherism and reliance on some non-authoritative gummint brochure as though it were a source of law which it certainly is not.
Actually, it is pretty typical that our government would leave some fruit like that hanging where it would have the most impact towards any immigrants’ teaching and understanding of the constitutional requirement and then argue otherwise everywhere else.
The double standard is what kills me.
The statement had to have come from somewhere. The fact that it is still there means someone in the INS still believes that to be the proper interpretation.