Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlackElk
Justice Gray, Wong Kim Ark v US, SCOTUS  photo image_zps9mkwyqlq.jpeg
379 posted on 01/24/2016 6:57:36 PM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies ]


To: bushpilot2
Was Wong Kim Ark running for POTUS? Language about US law as to Americans born abroad was NOT before the Court. Can you spell DICTA? Do you know what it means in this context?

It does not matter how you answer those questions. You have wasted entirely too much of my time over the last two days with this Birther fantasy. I have said what I have to say and far more than I need to say. Au revoir! You need not answer and, if you do, I see no further reason to answer you.

Time to move on to more productive issues. If your hero is "elected" because he has purported to disqualify the only remaining actual conservative, and should (extremely unlikely) obtain the connivance of corrupt courts, I will await with eager anticipation the disappointment of those "conservatives" who somehow believe that he s cognizably "conservative." Good luck with that.

I am willing to vote for the poseur ONLY because he is not the Arkansas Medusa or Comrade Bernie or Nanny Bloomberg and that is a provisional decision which is not set in concrete. The more Trump and his supporters aggravate me with this irrelevant Birther crap, the less likely I am not to vote my heart for Eternal Vigilance as I did in 2012.

386 posted on 01/25/2016 11:36:59 AM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline: Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society/Rack 'em Danno!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson