Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlackElk
I didn't proof my work well at all ...

No. The Act of Congress in force at the time Obama was born (similar to the one in force now) required the citizen parent to reside in the US for five years subsequent to their 14th birthday. Comrade Stanley Anne birthed Barry when she was 18, so could not have completed the requirement recited in the Act.

Almost certain some other errors of mine, that create confusion. Hopefully you get the jist anyway.

343 posted on 01/22/2016 3:30:22 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
No need for apology. We all think much faster than we can possibly type and are eager to raise and defend our respective opinions. One important thing is that we agree on so many other substantive issues.

I do get the gist but I cannot imagine that Congress has the power (or the guts) to make such distinctions which, in any event beg the question. If Obozo was a NBC (as I believe) then Congress has NO ROLE in the process. If he was NOT an NBC, then Article I, Section 8, "To establish an uniform rule of naturalization" probably confers the naturalization power on Congress and you are right.

However, SCOTUS is NOT looking for the kind of extreme controversy that would be generated if they did nothing about Obozo and interfered with Cruz declaring him ineligible. There would be busy guillotines in and on the streets on all approaches to the SCOTUS building and new aspiring Robespierres, Dantons, and their ilk until they too are separated from their heads.

348 posted on 01/22/2016 3:59:38 PM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline: Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society/Rack 'em Danno!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson