“Oh yeah. I read the thread. Did you? Or maybe you’re so blinded by your bias that you can’t see where the vitriol begins.”
Yes, I did read it and I DID acknowledge that the vitriol on BOTH sides is out of control. I don’t see that as biased.
“*I* didn’t attack you about Weiner.”
I never claimed that you did! I was using it as an example. My point was that there is very little discussion about the actual issues and facts. Instead FR is degrading to mudslinging, hence the DU reference.
“Pure insanity? You got that right! This is like a barroom brawl.”
On that we have complete agreement.
“Reading comprehension, CSM, please.”
That clearly needs to take place in both directions.
“you are apparently a Cruz supporter, said ‘You’re the oneS (plural) who are causing (or whatever) all the drama & conflict. And I stand by that.”
Well, obviously it is not ALL of the drama. Which is precisely why I provided the specific example for you.
“Y’ALL- All of y’all (you, too) need to settle down. We’re not starting it, but we’ll sure as the devil not put up with it if you do.”
Well, if you actually consider the article that led to this thread, it WAS started by Trump himself. If he is attacking a Conservative from the Left, then it merits a reply.
I have no issues having disagreements on policy, proposals, etc. However, Trump himself has stooped to a level of mudslinging that is only destructive to Conservatism and YES it is fair to address his leftist attacks.
He should get back to discussing the issues in an effort to convince the electorate that he IS truly convinced of Conservative principles.
Well, you guys just want to argue. And I have neither the inclination or the time to do that today. Maybe some other day.
Have a nice weekend.