[chae]

I disagree and here’s why. Over the weekend I was told by many Trump supporters on this forum that the behavior of Trump’s children was a direct result of the spectacular job that Donald did raising them.
If that is true, is not the reverse true as well?

[deport]

If that is true, is not the reverse true as well?

*******************

That may well be. I just hope that your son Logan isn’t a disappointment to you at some
point in your life. Sometimes we do our best as we see it and that still doesn’t keep
individuals from doing things we don’t approve of.

[Dr. Sivana]

I disagree and here’s why. Over the weekend I was told by many Trump supporters on this forum that the behavior of Trump’s children was a direct result of the spectacular job that Donald did raising them. If that is true, is not the reverse true as well?

Not necessarily. I have seen families with 12 kids, all treated as similarly as possible, and each one is his own, with different results.

I don't know much about Trump's kids, except that they are attractive, don't get into legal/drinking trouble, and are financially successful.

That doesn't make him a great father. Frankly, leaving their mother (in the case of Ivana's kids) disqualifies him for that. (In the unlikely event that she was the driving force, it still means the children did not have an ideal upbring, and have done well in the world despite it, not because of it.)

President Reagan's kids were mostly a side show (Michael neing the exception). Reagan was a great president.

Palin's son served, and I know some good men who were messed up (alcohol especially) after that.

I don't mind Trump or his supporters being positive about his children. Smart voters know "your mileage may vary".

Of course, the Cruz girls are little sweeties, and can more than hold their own.

[mkjessup]

I disagree and here's why. Over the weekend I was told by many Trump supporters on this forum that the behavior of Trump's children was a direct result of the spectacular job that Donald did raising them.
If that is true, is not the reverse true as well?

No. Sarah Palin is not running for office, Donald Trump is. And if elected, Trump's family will certainly be under the microscope as part of the First Family, and they are being scrutinized right now.

Sarah Palin is on the campaign trail not seeking votes for herself, not seeking elective office, she is supporting Donald Trump, nothing more and nothing less, and that is why her children and family should not be subjected to your kinds of smears. If she is selected as Trump's VP, then it will (to the delight of Palin-haters) be open season.

Until then? I'd advise you to shut your yap about it.