Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: biff
Because that is where the definitions of natural, naturalized were changed/upgraded, who qualifies, who doesn’t, etc.

Not much of an answer. Anyway...

The term "natural" does not appear in the statute. Title 8 - ALIENS AND NATIONALITY CHAPTER 12 - IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY SUBCHAPTER I - GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec. 1101 - Definitions
Try again.

97 posted on 01/21/2016 8:08:15 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamiin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: philman_36

Jeese, that was 2011 and what Cruz was covered under was the law at his time of birth.

I am not going to waste any more time on this until the SC makes the decision. Then maybe you will be satisfied one way or another. There are constitutional lawyers on both sides of this subject no matter how many references you provide. Even Trump said he had consulted all his lawyers in Sept. last year and they all said Cruz was legal!!!!!

So you and I and everybody else is just going to have to wait.


98 posted on 01/21/2016 8:17:59 AM PST by biff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson