You Trumpbots are really nuts. The format of the report places the quoted passage under the heading Additional and or Dissenting Views. She gave a perfunctory statement of support and then emphasized (I used the word emphasized to give even Trumpbots a clue that I was going to talk about what she emphasized) the importance of private markets. You might have heard that emphasis on private markets is a kind of conservative view of how things should work.
Of course, you Trumpbots pick on these absolutely stupid points because it sure beats trying to explain away Trump’s outrageously anti-conservative record, his spectacular inconsistency, his past support and praise for Hillary and Bill Clinton and his generally thuggish behavior. But let’s talk about a wonky 2005 report the candidate’s wife had some small role in. Yeah, that’s important. You are all morphing into little Paul Begalas and James Carvilles. Sick.
Says the retard who tried to spin the report as a conservative document, not at all EU-ish, but now has changed his tune a little.
She gave a perfunctory statement of support
Support for what? "The report and its recommendations." What is the report and its recommendations? Hint: A North American Union.
You might have heard that emphasis on private markets is a kind of conservative view
If she had advocated for Secure Borders over a Free Market, she'd actually be conservative. Advocating for open borders but a "free market" is just pandering to her Corporatist and Bankster Overlords.
Yes, that's Ted Cruz's brand of Conservatism. It's not MY conservatism. Guess I'm too American to support Cruz conservatism.