Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sitetest
Maybe if enough of us do that, Republicans will nominate an ACTUAL CONSERVATIVE.

It doesn't work like that.

You're not punishing a child. It will be seen, again, as a national trend toward all thing democrat.

Evangelical Christians as a group have almost single handedly put the constitution and our whole way of life on the chopping block.

If Republicans lose the WH in 2016 we can almost certainly look at the loss of Mitt Romney as the death stroke.

By that I mean look who we're running against. HRC, who is corrupt and incompetent and IMO, evil. And Bernie Sanders...an avowed socialist. BHO's victories have set the tone in this country to where an avowed socialist can be the front runner of a Presidential election.

And you're suggesting we do it again? Put BS into the White House? A socialist? Really?

I want the Republican to win so that the Democrat agenda takes a hard hit. I want the homo agenda to take a big hit. I want socialism to LOSE big!

I do not want Ted Cruz to be the candidate because he's an Evangelical. And I don't think he's got what it takes to sit at the table with Putin.

I have the hardest choice in this election. More so than you. If Cruz gets the nomination, I have to choose between someone that hates me personally (through associations) and someone that wants to take away my way of life. Well, both would take away my way of life they could get away with it.

So where's the win for me?
415 posted on 01/20/2016 6:46:29 AM PST by StormPrepper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies ]


To: StormPrepper; Norm Lenhart

I’m not an evangelical Christian. I know a bunch. I like ‘em. I feel fairly comfortable with them. But I have a few disagreements with them, so please stop lumping me in with them.

I’m tired of the folks “running as conservatives.” Why not nominate an actual conservative?

You’re calculus is wrong. You appear to blame our electoral losses on conservative voters who weren’t excited in large numbers to vote for liberals. We might not do so well until we bring conservatives back into the picture by nominating a conservative.

Moral of the story: don’t nominate an ultra liberal masquerading as a conservative.

I have no problem with President Cruz going against Putin. He’ll be tough as nails and won’t give away the store.

With whacky trump, I don’t know whether he’ll start a nuclear war or give away the store. I guess it depends on which side of the bed on which he gets up.

Kinda like the 45% tariffs he’s not going to impose. Up until he imposes them.

Or the tens of billions (hundreds of billions?) of dollars we’re going to spend forcibly deporting every illegal, only to spend some tens of billions of dollars (I hope) to “expedite” their legal re-entry. So we get around 10,000,000 new citizens that we never anticipated having.

Or his pro-life views that he loudly touts. Until asked if he really means it, and he answers, “It depends when.”


419 posted on 01/20/2016 7:21:08 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson