By the way, the definition of naturalized in the dissents opinion is not dicta since it directly addresses the specifics of the case before them, that being he had to be determined naturalized first before they could strip his citizenship from him.
Not so!
Dissenting opinion was in error!
Anyone can be stripped of their citizenship; remember Nolan? The man without a country?
The dissenters were nut cases.
Not so!
Dissenting opinion was in error!
Anyone can be stripped of their citizenship; remember Nolan? The man without a country?
The dissenters were nut cases.