I am having a hard time deciding if you are willful, or just stubborn. Either way, you are misleading, and I wouldn't trust you with my socks.
If you want to end the discussion, it probably is not a good idea to decsend to the personal insult level.
As to the substance of this issue, the Supreme Court authorities draw a distinction where the deficiency is eligibility.
Good point. Now, please put me on your ignore list.
May I just thank you for an interesting and highly informative thread (apart from the recent snarky insults). I appreciate the knowledge shared here and the intelligent discussion, which is sadly not the norm these days on FR.
Some of us have been following (and some researching in depth) the murky origins of 0 since he announced his candidacy in 2007. There is so much smoke there. I long to see the fire.