SHOCK: Glenn Beck Warns Of “Monster Far Worse” Than Barack H. Obama

Conservative Tribune ^ | January 16, 2016 | Addison Riddleberger

[The Iceman Cometh]

[abbastanza]

This is what happens when you listen to your own BS for too long.

[Georgia Girl 2]

LMAO!!

[20yearsofinternet]

LOL @ that pic and your tag line, nice!

I expect Glenn is further losing his marbles over the mean old Trump and his pesky advocacy for upholding the law vs. Glenn and Ted’s slumber party on the boarder handing out toys to juvenile criminals.

[datura]

You are one of the nominees to be Beck here in FR.

Thanks for casting your own vote. Again.

[brivette]

Good movie!

[LoneRangerMassachusetts]

In life, one has to learn how to loosen up and have a drink or two. Being a drunk or teetotaler f&$ks up the brain.

[brivette]

Clever!

[Scirparius]

Disclaimer: I never watch or listen to Beck. Beck makes some of the same claims I do. DT is the alternate universe bambi in the sense of his use of intimidation, bullying and name calling of all who dare disagree. Also DT shares the quality of bambi in 2008 as said by many - DT is whatever you think he is, never mind facts - it is cult like.

Look, personally, I like Trump. I like his message, I like his style. But I realize he is a flawed candidate, and one of those flaws is that he has not been particularly consistent on a lot of the issues he is now gung-ho about.

That said, what is the worst that could happen? I mean, literally, the absolute worst? The current uniparty system is driving us straight into super-eco-socialist-communism with a healthy helping of "blame it all on the white people".

Obama, or the people behind Obama, have already essentially turned our government into a tyranny with both the legislature and the judiciary beholden to the same powers-that-be behind the executive branch. Never before in the history of this country has the executive branch been so completely unfettered by any checks and balances, except perhaps during the Civil War.

I'm not saying Trump is a potential dictator, and I'm not suggesting that what we need is to elect a dictator. I'm just saying, hey, let's really look at this fear-mongering "Trump is a dictator!" meme and let's start being really honest about where we really are as a country.

So what if we elect someone -- Trump, Cruz, Hillary, whoever -- and he declares himself a dictator? One of two things happen: either we all just grumblingly accept the public announcement of what the current underlying reality is, or we finally stand up and take the power back.

Our voices are not heard. Our votes do not count. The evidence that the political class/aristocracy in D.C. care only about maintain their own power and wealth is crystal clear -- and the opposition to Trump is even more evidence of that.

Our "representatives" are bought and paid for by special interests that care nothing about America. Just look at the illegal immigration issue: there is literally no valid social, moral or business reason to support illegal immigration, and the vast majority of American people are absolutely dead set against it. Even the "cheap labor" argument falls because legalizing those illegal immigrants means you have to pay them minimum wage, insurance, etc.

The FBI could go into that stand-off in Wyoming and Waco the crap out of all of them, and while a lot of people would shake the blogosphere with wrath and a few "serious" media people would raise an eyebrow and ask some harsh rhetorical questions... there would be no real consequences. None. Obama would get on the TV the next day and cite it as yet another reason to get rid of that pesky old 2nd Amendment.

The place we're in now as a country... it's not getting fixed through voting. Sorry, you could clone Ronald Reagan himself and elect him president again, and it wouldn't change a thing.

The Republic is dead. It's all Animal Farm now, kiddos, and we ain't the pigs.

Sorry... end rant.

[RetSignman]

Thanks Laz, I was searching for that image and you saved me the time.

[garfield]

Beginning with Th. Jefferson, presidents impounded funds appropriated by Congress. This process came to an end with Richard Nixon. In 1974 Congress passed the Congressional Budget Impoundment and Control Act of 1974. Since that time no President has lawfully been able to impound spending. This explains the explosive growth in the deficit and national debt since the mid-1970s.

[Enduro Guy]

Poor Glenn, I think that’s just the stress talking...

[Lazamataz]

You aware of a rule on the net called the Godwin Law? You have invoked it and thus lose the argument.

People who invoke Godwin's Law are JUST LIKE HITLER!

[Williams]

F Beck.

[Rebelbase]

This country needs the societal chaos that a Trump presidency would bring.

[nikos1121]

Thank you. I’m not saying this cause I dislike the guy, but the anger irrationality runs deep with him. I think he’s about to blow.

I doubt that he would start drinking again, but I feel like he has been super off for months now. His irritability level is quite low.

[RetSignman]

Beck’s prophetic statement...”I’ve been broke before and I’ll be broke again”

The guy is a visionary.

[catnipman]

The thing that concerns me most about nut-job Beck is if he suddenly endorsed Trump. Now THAT would be monstrous!

[Theophilus]

It could happen. I fear if it gets much worse the nation could elect the next Hitler on the promise of televised public floggings for Wall Street bankers and corrupt politicians.

Beck is right and it's also true of Cruz (who I obviously favor) or anyone else how wins. Power is more concentrated in the Presidency than ever. Any crisis will trigger and accelerate even more accumulation of power.

[MrB]

Actually, it would be a fight to restore societal order.
The left is all about creating chaos in order to enable their change.