Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GIdget2004

“15-674 UNITED STATES, ET AL. V. TEXAS, ET AL.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. In
addition to the questions presented by the petition, the parties
are directed to brief and argue the following question: “Whether
the Guidance violates the Take Care Clause of the Constitution,
Art. II, §3.” “

I thought this was just about the injunction, but maybe they’re going to hear the case?


12 posted on 01/19/2016 6:44:20 AM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mrsmith
They have to hear it on the merits, I think.

Separation of powers and remedy can be tricky. Whose job is it to check that the president "Take Care" and enforce Congressional Act. I think it is Congress, which is the most dysfunctional and worthless institution on the planet. If Congress thinks the president has violated his oath, impeach and remove him.

That gets the heat out of the court system, which is job number one.

19 posted on 01/19/2016 6:50:50 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: mrsmith
When I searched, I found this complementary statement regarding fealty to the "Take Care" clause.
80 posted on 01/19/2016 8:49:55 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze (If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson