Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Toddsterpatriot
If some have their way “natural born” would be removed. There was no ambiguity to the framers what natural born means... Wonder why some now need to have it defined? I know what it means, and I sure do not need a law degree to understand. I would love to hear Tribe's definition.

Given who gets appointed to the judiciary these day none should want their take...obamacare notwithstanding... Congress has not dared to mess with ‘natural born’ yet. But given the opportunity and the reaction by some of the Cruz supporters just might give some in Congress the notion they need to fix what is not broken

‘Natural born’ is a birthright.. I do not believe any entity has the authority to take another person's birthright...There will never be 100% agreement to end natural born status.

199 posted on 01/19/2016 1:55:27 PM PST by Just mythoughts (Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]


To: Just mythoughts
There was no ambiguity to the framers what natural born means...

Except for leaving out the actual defining characteristics.

Congress has not dared to mess with 'natural born' yet.

Except for all the laws that define naturalization and when it is and isn't needed to be a citizen.

'Natural born' is a birthright..

Exactly. Being born to an American parent is usually all it takes.

202 posted on 01/19/2016 2:32:33 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot ("Telling the government to lower trade barriers to zero...is government interference" central_va)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson