[Greetings_Puny_Humans]

As opposed to a flaming dissembler? There are two kinds of "open borders," those for trade and those for immigration. Expediting trade is fine. Expediting immigration is not.

You are an idiot. The "expediting trade" includes the unlimited flow of labor.

None of what you quoted implies that people will freely immigrate to the United States.

It even states: "Canada and the United States should consider eliminating restrictions on labor mobility altogether and work toward solutions that, in the long run, could enable the extension of full labor mobility to Mexico as well"

It then goes on to recommend the formation of a common security barrier and joint training of law enforcement, the annihilation of the visa system and all physical barriers and its replacement by a single Bio-Metric pass for Canadians, Americans and Mexicans for the purpose of free movement between the three nations (open borders), a North American Inter-Parliamentary group among other Inter-governmental institutions, among many other nefarious things.

IOW, a North American Union modeled after the European Union. That is why Ted Cruz himself called the CFR a "den of snakes," and lied to his supporters by claiming that Heidi was a dissident to the CFR's goals.

[Carry_Okie]

You are an idiot. The "expediting trade" includes the unlimited flow of labor.

From Ted Cruz' immigration plan:

Halt any increases in legal immigration so long as American unemployment remains unacceptably high. The purpose of legal immigration should be to grow the economy, not to displace American workers. Under no circumstances should legal immigration levels be adjusted upwards so long as work-force participation rates remain below historical averages. So, you have said that Heidi Cruz' document was promoting the NAU. It does not; it holds sovereignty sacrosanct. You said that it was about unlimited labor. Ted's website says not and in writing. You call me an idiot. I call you a liar.