[Cboldt]

Things work, but your conclusion "a citizen at birth and that equates to natural born status" is false as a matter of law, as has been demonstrated by review of Bellei and the language of the constitution.

I mean really, if you read this exchange 5 years from now, you are going to be embarrassed at yourself.

[Cold Heat]

you are going to be embarrassed at yourself.

Probably not. As I argue this I glean more and more understanding. But never do I expect to express a conclusion in a way that will satisfy a legal beagle. It's just not in me.

So if I equate the two, it must mean that the law makes it look that way to a layman.

I suppose I could get into a conversation on electrical theory, and why some hospitals service is totally inadequate and you might not be able to follow my logic in either case.

I guess what I am saying is that it's more important for me to get the conclusion right at this point, then it is to explain how and why I got there. This is not in my skill set but I am quite willing to learn by making mistakes.