Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Squeako

I agree. It isn’t the EO, it the EO that doesn’t meet the guidelines that you just described.

Since Congress has done NOTHING to stop Obama from abusing EO’s (with the approval of the Justice Department I might add), the only way to know what Trump will do is to read the EO’s he submits.

In other words, he has to issue them for us to know what’s in them.

He already said he would issue an EO allowing Military Members to Carry Weapons on Base. Is that an Unconstitutional EO? I don’t know, do you?


97 posted on 01/18/2016 9:02:11 PM PST by Kickass Conservative (Get the CDS and TDS Vaccines before it's too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: Kickass Conservative

I don’t know who makes the rules regarding being armed on base. But making that EO shouldn’t override existing federal law. If it does, well that’s not how our system is supposed to work. The president isn’t allowed (or at least isn’t supposed to be) to write law.


100 posted on 01/18/2016 9:12:05 PM PST by Squeako (Trump: The Red Kool-Aid to Obama's Blue Kool-Aid. (See home page for Rules For Trumpicals))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

To: Kickass Conservative
In other words, he has to issue them for us to know what’s in them

You might want to rephrase this...if you can...it sounds too much like a quote from someone after the passage of a certain bill and isn't reassuring sounding...LOL

103 posted on 01/18/2016 9:16:28 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson