Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: csivils

Do your own research. It really is not that hard. Put in ‘original intent’ of the Constitutional phrase ‘natural born’...

Now there are a bevy of people all across this nation on both sides of the political spectrum that do not care for that requirement ‘natural born’, but thus far you are not going to find ‘case law’ or acts of Congress that has touched it... Cruz knows darn well he does not fit the ‘original intent’ of ‘natural born’.


144 posted on 01/18/2016 1:18:19 PM PST by Just mythoughts (Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]


To: Just mythoughts

As a nation of laws, the content of google is not authoritative. It can be a useful tool to help find something authoritative, but as you readily admitted, there isn’t much to go on.

If you believe that congress can not define what is not present in the constitution, then you cannot believe in the rule of law. The only other options is really rule by justice since there are many documents and the answer can depend on which document is cherry picked.

I reject your premise, and absence an agreement on that... there is not ground to debate on. We simply disagree.


166 posted on 01/18/2016 2:25:14 PM PST by csivils
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson