Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance

Personhood amendments ran into other troubles because of penalties they would require or invite over situations like unimplanted zygotes. The idea has been thought of, however do we want to raise federal cases over every miscarriage as well. Trying to allow for such cases would be difficult without leaving openings for purposed abortion, without facing the abortion issue directly.

Abortion is what needs to be stopped. Trying to sidle up on that from a different angle is to invite difficulties we never needed.


144 posted on 01/17/2016 5:38:08 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck

I have no idea what that means.

My position is very clear.

The supreme law of our land absolutely requires that equal protection be provided for the right to life of every person.

It’s not optional, and we must stop acting like it is.


150 posted on 01/17/2016 5:41:33 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Cruz + Rubio doesn't even add up to one natural born citizen. Still short a citizen father.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson