I personally don’t understand the ruling or the reasons for it.
However, I don’t see the relevance.
Trump would not be allowed to appoint his sister to the Supreme Court simply because she is his sister.
And the fact that Trump loves his sister does not mean he necessarily agrees with with her or even knows about her rulings in court.
I have a sister whom I love dearly and I would never say anything critical about her but that doesn’t mean I agree with everything she does or everything she believes.
“I have a sister whom I love dearly and I would never say anything critical about her but that doesn’t mean I agree with everything she does or everything she believes.’
I feel the same way about my 2 lib daughters.
We all get along just fine——and avoid some topics.
.
However, I don't see the relevance.
I think the relevance is what Trump views as what would be a 'phenomenal' justice.
I have a sister whom I love dearly and I would never say anything critical about her but that doesn't mean I agree with everything she does or everything she believes.
Same here, but wouldn't say she'd be phenomenal in my presidential administration, one of the best ever on the court or whatever position was being discussed. I'd say pretty much what you did:" "she's great but we disagree on some important issues."
What you or I would say about our siblings and what a candidate for president says about USSC appointments is quite a different situation.
Given her record on partial birth abortion and Trump's previous support of it, he should distance himself on that issue at the least. If he really believes it important and doesn't support her views on it.