Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: springwater13

It’s good to hear it now, but I would be more impressed if he made these comments back when Roberts was nominated.


13 posted on 01/17/2016 12:03:35 PM PST by patq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: patq

Hindsight is 20/20. I didn’t see a single complaint here on FR when he was appointed.


18 posted on 01/17/2016 12:15:20 PM PST by kik5150 (Cruz argued 9 times before Supreme Court judges. Trump argues with beauty pageant judges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: patq

It’s good to hear it now, but I would be more impressed if he made these comments back when Roberts was nominated.
___________________________________________________________

Who would be more likely to know?

A business man or the person who brought him into the Bush administration?


63 posted on 01/17/2016 4:22:02 PM PST by Amntn ("The only special interest not being served by our government is the American people" - Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: patq

Obamacare was not set in stone when Roberts was under consideration for the SCOTUS ... Chief Justice Roberts, however, set it in stone by his asinine and convoluted reasoning.


98 posted on 01/17/2016 6:23:38 PM PST by WTFOVR (I find myself exclaiming that expression quite often these days!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: patq

“...I would be more impressed if he made these comments back when Roberts was nominated.”

How psychic would THAT be ??? Imagine knowing in 2005 that Roberts would uphold an atrocious law passed in 2010. If he could do that, I’d ask Trump to pick my lottery numbers.


132 posted on 01/17/2016 8:35:22 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson