Lawlessness is personified in forcing the constitutional text to say things it doesn’t say. That is the heart of the progressive deconstruction of the Constitutional order, and those pushing the Vattel rule as if it were binding law are doing just that, twisting the Constitution.
As for trying to pin the misdeeds of illegal aliens on anchor babies, and anchor babies on Ark, that just drivel. Sorry. Nations all through history have had various rules of citizenship, jus soli versus jus sanginis etc. But those that become citizens by a legal means, even if we disapprove of that mechanism, they are not illegals.
Instead, it is the folks who come over here in complete disregard of any rule of law, and the two governments that allow it, and encourage the transfer of the worst elements by these illegal means, who are the problem. The rest of it is just a desperate blood libel designed to win an argument in the court of emotion and passion that has been lost in the court of reason. Doesn’t work on some of us. Sorry.
Peace,
SR
“Lawlessness is personified in forcing the constitutional text to say things it doesn’t say. That is the heart of the progressive deconstruction of the Constitutional order, and those pushing the Vattel rule as if it were binding law are doing just that, twisting the Constitution.”
That is just the usual baseless flat out lie. The usage in the Constitution is traceable back to the Naturalization Act of 1541, which is the first time English commoners were granted the right to naturalize the alien born children of an English father. You folks are just inventing lawless fairy tales.
Assume this is the year 1916, instead of 2016. Then explain to everyone how you are not going to be “twisting the Constitution” when you describe how you will justify Ted Cruz being a natural born citizen and eligible to be POTUS.