You repeatly post that your reading of the phrase "children of citizens" in the above 1790 statute means 2 USC parents are required. But you refuse to respond to my reply debunking that claim. I'll give you another chance:
Those who claim the plural "citizens" excludes children of only 1 citizen parent must also claim that the plural "children" excludes only 1 child of citizen parents!Clearly an unsupportable reading of the statute.