Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sauropod

Review my history??

Rather condescending comment.

What do you think ‘drove people from the land’ is? sounds like conquest to me. We also purchased large parcels or conquered large parcel from other who had conquered the land.

I am not sure what point you are trying to make. I was attempting to explain that ‘eminent domain’ is not written into the constitution. Are you trying to say that driving people from their land was NOT a purchase or a conquest. Maybe it was a negotiated settlement.

The only place that I am aware of where eminent domain does not apply is base upon the treaty whereby we conquered land from Mexico. The treaty stated that the U.S. would recognize the Mexican Land Grants that could be proven and direct ancestral lineage.


184 posted on 01/18/2016 1:29:42 PM PST by dirtymac (Now is the time for all good men (people) to come to the aid of their country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]


To: dirtymac

We purchased land from the indians, or outright took it from them. Indians were moved onto reservations and then we moved them off the land reserved for them when we decided we wanted their land for settlement. This happened in Ohio and other places.

It’s not as simplistic as your original comment made it out to be. Hence my comment to you.


188 posted on 01/18/2016 2:58:29 PM PST by sauropod (I am His and He is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson