You're damned right Coulter is being pragmatic -- she is trying to hold on to as wide a swath of her fan base that she can. If that means supporting functional amoral leftists like Mitt Romney, if that means supporting serial party-switcher and outright "Now-Ted-just-switched-his-views-on-ethanol" liar Donald Trump and suggesting Romney as his VP, so be it. She pragmatically wants to have her cake and eat it too.
As a "conservative," Ann Colter has become as phony as the candidates she supports. "Pragmatism" means putting desire ahead of righteousness.
Romney would have been a REPUBLICAN Obama, WORSE than Obama because he would be doing his amoral crap in the name of Republicans. Spodefly, OWN WHAT YOU VOTE FOR.
When you voted for Romney, here is a plain, pragmatic fact: you voted for turning the Republican party and America hard left.
Get it through your head. That is what you voted FOR, because if what you voted for had won, that is what would have happened.
Now you can BS yourself and "pragmatically" pretend that you didn't vote for Romney, you voted against Obama, but it is a way of lying to yourself for voting to turn the GOP and America hard left.
Dammit, spodefly, have the balls to own what you vote for, and have the maturity to accept the hard truth that voting "against" is pure 100 percent rationalization based on fiction.
I didn't vote for Romney. I took a principled stand and went skiing in Canada during the first week of November in 2012. I am not a proponent of the "lesser of 2 evils" approach. But I won't go that route again. We don't have 4 more years to allow President Clinton to open the floodgates. If we don't get someone, even a less than perfect someone, in office that "puts up a wall", then its all moot from here on ...