Cruz's ground game:
Another is a "9/11 truther" with a website claiming that the Sept. 11 attacks were a government conspiracy.
Sounds about right...
Republicans are going to have to ask themselves the question about Trump: ‘Do we want a candidate who could be in a mental hospital in two years?’ That’d be a big problem. It’d be a very precarious one for Republicans because he’d be running and then he would break down at some point. You don’t want to be running and have that kind of thing over your head.
I’d hate to see something like that get in his way. But a lot of people are talking about it and I know that even some mental health professionals have concerns, the fact that he shows clear signs of mental instability and could break down at any point.
Here’s what I think I’d do: I’d go and seek a full psychiatric screening if I was Donald. You go see a psychiatrist. You go to a doctor to ask for what’s called a psychological screening. You go in seeking a clean bill of psychiatric health from the doctor, even if you think you’re doing just great. That’s part of the problem with mental illness, it’s hard to detect in yourself. Donald could go right in, do it quickly. It can go quickly. Clean bill of health, very good.
Cruz's ground game:
Ed Straker’s articles have been calling Trump a “liar” and other things over the past few days. I am not sure we should be relying on his apparent reporting for an idea of Trump’s ground game. He has TDS galore.
Lets just see what happens—I believe Trumps Supporters will walk over broken glass to vote—They will outnumber the Bible Thumpers that win in most cases. Just a few weeks and the truth will be known—until then expect Trump to be called (not in this order) A Nazi, A Mormon, a Liberal, a Socialist, a communist, a gangster, a horder, a child molester, a divorced man, a Tryrant, a King wantabee, etc...
GO TRUMP!
DT is the greatest this can’t be so or attack the source.
There trumpees, posted for all of you.
Some look at facts. Others are gaga for a low-info reality show star.
Has any other candidates “team” been vetted by the press?
Fewer than 1000 people voted in the GOP caucus in 2012 in this (Jefferson) county. Ron Paul got almost half the presidential preference votes in the county that hosts Maharishi University and is dominated by Democrats. This is just a smear by seeking out the most non-typical place the author could find.
He won't necessarily tell you what he is doing, but he IS doing it.
Help me out. When was the last time the Iowa caucus was won by the eventual nominee, aside from an incumbent. 1980?
Team Trump has been silent in answering the critics of his Iowa ground game.
He may be applying one of Sun Tzu’s rules: When strong, appear weak.
As much as I don’t like Trump, his lack of a ground game in Iowa, if in fact the article is accurate, doesn’t matter much. Winning the Iowa caucus is not a requirement for winning the nomination and ultimately the election.
Sounds like we are headed to a point where Cruz gets wiped out, then Trump crashes and burns.
And then, we have to look who remains.