Interesting theory. Good for a laugh too. But my idea may be simpler. Just pull out of the U.N. and tell them to go build a building somewhere else in the world that will be more accommodating to their One World Order idea, and let the other socialist countries support them, we’re DONE! Without us to feed their insatiable greed, they will collapse, because the countries who have the most say there now are the countries wwho want us to foot the bill for everything. They’re not going tom shell out for all the socalled peace keeping operations and every other gimmick they can come up with to bleed us dry. It will collapse of its own weight.
While the direct approach might work, the left will fight it every inch of the way, which is why the indirect approach might be better.
The left, internationalist socialists, wants one-world government, hideously enough, run by some organization like the UN. Yes, they are that stupid. However, if another UN building or two were proposed to them, they might support the idea, thinking that it would *grow* their stupid idea.
However, either Moscow or Beijing would make NYC look like a pleasant, civilized and temperate garden spot. Moscow is frozen half the year, and Beijing is under a poisonous cloud of smog and dust.
In either case, making life for UN delegates far less pleasant. And since right now, most of them benefit from nepotism and cronyism, they are delegates for the money and perks, not for the work. And being relocated to either place would convince many of these parasites to look for a new host to suck from.
So the UN would die from lack of interest.