This is just hilarious. This primary has really separated the chaff from the wheat. Some anti-constitutional law professor is telling you what the constitution’s original intent is and you run with it because it helps your candidate.
Your candidate: the guy who donated to Clintons, Corey Booker, Terry McAuliffe, Chuck Schumer, and Rahm Emanuel. The guy who said Obama was doing a great job. He said Bill Clinton is a great person. He said Warren Buffet would be on his presidential staff. The guy who sent people to the Playboy Mansion as a reward for winning his reality/game show. The guy who rents apartments to terrorists. The guy who makes fake universities, charges tuition, and never shows up. The guy who buys politicians. The guy who uses his government ties to try to steal old ladies property....
This is the guy you’re hoping wins, and for his benefit, you’re hoping this anti-constitutional law professor’s interpretation will hurt a true conservative.
Did you read the article?
To me the only question is - is he a true conservative or a convenient conservative?
I think Ted needs to be vetted the same as everyone else.
I like what I hear Trump saying but yes, he has issues. So does Ted - and I don’t take TC’s word for everything because the man is a professional talker and very good at it...I have to look at what he’s done.
This whole season is about making up our minds, a long and arduous process. I lean Trump because of the immigration issue. Can we trust TC on this?
“anti-constitutional law professor is telling you what the constitution’s original intent is”
You know why he is anti-Constitutional? Because he knows the original intent.