[major-pelham]

You’re still doing this. NO NO NO one can use eminent domain for private use - only government officials can do that. A private interest could nudge a public entity asking them to do a taking but it’s only the elected officials that can actually take then distribute.

So are you to blame when you go to your City Council and say hey I’l build the Taj Mahal on that choice piece of land Jim owns over there and then they condemn it and friggin give it to you? I say not. I say the scoundrels on the City Council are the culprits and thats where the fault lies.

Lastly, that little house you guys love to bring up is still there.

[Fresh Wind]

“Home of Atlantic City Resident Who Challenged Trump Sold”

http://6abc.com/news/home-of-ac-resident-who-challenged-trump-sold/184080/

[elhombrelibre]

That little house is still there because in that case Trump failed. I know Trump is a WINNER. He says it all the time. But he lost that time.

[Yosemitest]

"NO NO NO one can use eminent domain for private use - only government officials can do that."

If the government take someone property, just to give it to another private company, because they think they can get a larger tax income, from the deal,
then it's WRONG !

It's UNCONSTITUTIONAL !
So ... the guilty SHOULD BE BLAMED !