Has SCOTUS ever referenced Mark Levin as a writer on public law? They have Vattel numerous times.
You claim Mark Levin is the known expert on public law but at the same instant ignore Vattel.
Rogers v Bellei, Wong Kim Ark, Luria, Minor v Happersett and others do not help Rafael Cruz Jr’s., eligibility claims.
Why do you push a flawed eligibility candidate?
1790 never applied to Rafael Cruz Jr., you’re setting up Cruz for embarrassment.
This will be his Waterloo.
I reject Vattel’s opinions on who or what is a natural born or more particularly how citizenship should pass from parent to child.
I don’t reject everything Vattel wrote.
Furthermore, I don’t agree that on this particular matter, that he had much influence on the founders.