Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bushpilot2

Yup.....

Therin lies the disagreement. This disagreement dated back pre-founding to English law of allegiances to the King.

Thankfully we don’t have a King and we did not adopt that language, although various legal analysts often bring it up.

This has much to do with original intent and there is a historical string of decisions that will confirm it and that the law of nations and such pre-constitutional law was not the intent.


372 posted on 01/11/2016 5:26:13 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies ]


To: Cold Heat

You’re making a mistake bringing up the Law of Nations.


376 posted on 01/11/2016 5:34:23 PM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson