[Cold Heat]

The definitions of naturalization and usage of datus and natus is a fact found in Coke, Edward, Sir. Selected Writings of Sir Edward Coke: Volume I. 1608. p. 206.

True only to the British Citizen.

Not the US...

We can carry this on until infinity but your argument will always fall flat as it has no substance or standing.

So apologies are not going to occur, and to take it a football field further, (since I am watching the games today) This attack by trump has not only infuriated me, it may well have cost him if he happens to win the nomination.

I assume that is also a insult to you so carry on!

[WhiskeyX]

“True only to the British Citizen. “

That is yet another totally false statement. A British Subject was a British national. A citizen of the United States and a national of the United States are both nationals as defined in the U.S. Code. The fundamental definition of nationalization remains the same as it was in 1608 and in 1541 England, See the Naturalization Act of 1541.

[WhiskeyX]

Type Correction:

“True only to the British Citizen. “

That is yet another totally false statement. A British Subject was a British national. A citizen of the United States and a national of the United States are both nationals as defined in the U.S. Code. The fundamental definition of naturalization remains the same as it was in 1608 and in 1541 England, See the Naturalization Act of 1541.