You clearly have not read, and are not familiar with, the opinion for a unanimous court which I reference. It does not mention Vattel, but it clearly states that in matters of citizenship the founders did not look to English common law, as many argue and as state courts have held in reference to the cases brought about the fraud in the Oval Office. The opinion makes it quite clear that English Common law, compared to what Vattel was writing about, was mere “municipal law.” Why insult me out of ignorance? It’s scarcely a convincing method of argument.
I do not insult you. My comment was not made in reference to any post of your or anyone else about a court decision. I don’t know why you keep bringing this up. When you say I am not familiar with the court decision you reference you are right. I do not know what you are talking about, but I certainly do not mean to insult you and I apologize if I have said anything that you take as an insult.