Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mollypitcher1
If the framers of the Constitution had wanted to use Vattel's definition they certainly could have, but they didn't and instead defined a natural born citizen quite differently in 1790. The same men who framed the Constitution said this:

The Act also establishes the United States citizenship of certain children of citizens, born abroad, without the need for naturalization: "the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens".

This act was indeed superceded by subsequent acts in 1795 and 1802 and many others up until today, but I think the framers thought they had defined natural born citizen sufficiently to not have to repeat it in every law.

122 posted on 01/10/2016 7:51:44 AM PST by conservativejoy (Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God ...We Can Elect Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: conservativejoy

“the children of citizens of the United States

Citizens is plural .....


135 posted on 01/10/2016 9:06:15 AM PST by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson