Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nero Germanicus
Who knows, since there is no recorded legislatve history to that effect. All I know is that since the adoption of the Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment in 1868 whoever qualifies as a Citizen of the United States At Birth under the 14th Amendment also qualifies as a Natural Born Citizen under Article II. Those two concepts have merged into one. Whether that was the Founder’s intent or not remains a mystery.

Are you suggesting that it is a mystery whether the founders intended "natural born citizen" to be defined by a law written 81 years in the future? I'm kinda thinking they didn't see that coming.

75 posted on 01/09/2016 2:37:54 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

The Founding Fathers were prescient enough to know that future generations would alter their thinking on many subjects. That’s why they punted on abolishing slavery in 1788.


80 posted on 01/09/2016 3:11:31 PM PST by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp

And a law which had nothing to do with the meaning of Natural-born citizen.


94 posted on 01/09/2016 9:45:24 PM PST by RobbyS (quotes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson