Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cargill will allow Muslims fired over religious accommodations to reapply after 30 days
Greeley Tribune ^ | 8 Jan 16 | Bridgett Weaver

Posted on 01/09/2016 3:50:35 AM PST by real saxophonist

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: real saxophonist

OMG...militant Somali Muslims are working in Cargile meat packing plants and have access to our food! Someone should print a list of brands that use this meat. I certainly don’t want it on my table. We became too familiar with the loathsome Somalies in MN.


21 posted on 01/09/2016 4:56:08 AM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

http://www.cargill.com/products/brands-advertising/


22 posted on 01/09/2016 5:02:01 AM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Awgie

No, don’t beef up security. Switch to producing only pork products.


23 posted on 01/09/2016 5:07:44 AM PST by ASA Vet (98C40K3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

‘’Thank-you for re-applying to work. Your application is under consideration for a position on our pork products line.’’


24 posted on 01/09/2016 5:12:22 AM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici
Business prudent my ass. Cargill should hire them back at lower wage or tell them to find another job that accommodates them.

Ok...guess you never ran a large business with hundred of employees before...

Back when I did, recruiting, hiring, training, getting an employee productive cost somewhere between $5K to 8K because of having to comply with the burdensome laws, policies, legalese, etc...

So saving that cost is business prudent...

Offering a lower wage is probably not legal if you are doing the same job or position...

25 posted on 01/09/2016 5:16:00 AM PST by Popman (Christ alone: My Cornerstone...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Gadsden1st
How long before Cargill has to recall products?

Exactly
Cargill's main concern should, they rehire the Somalis and the food is deliberately contaminated as revenge.

26 posted on 01/09/2016 5:26:15 AM PST by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

It should be 30 years, but if these ash holes re-hire these savages they deserve whatever the savages do to them financially and physically.


27 posted on 01/09/2016 5:32:00 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

LOL


28 posted on 01/09/2016 5:38:39 AM PST by real saxophonist (YouTube + Twitter + Facebook = YouTwitFace.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee
Someone should print a list of brands that use this meat.

Smithfield's is another brand that concerns me. It's Chinese owned now.
We stopped buying their hams in protest but it may get more involved than that now.
Our dear congress just passed a bill that removes the country of origin from meat products. Yes, that's right, crap from China (or any other country), pork, beef, chicken et al may very well turn up on our store shelves and we are not the wiser. Their wonderful shrimp is already here, but is usually labelled as such. The label is going away.
A Chinese owned company is almost guaranteed to import their adulterated crap.
Smithfield has a pretty extensive list of brands and products aside from the Smithfield Hams brand.
Congress claims their hands were tied because of some international court ruling. Yeah Riiiiight.

29 posted on 01/09/2016 5:45:05 AM PST by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

“They said they could re-apply. They didn’t say they would hire them back.”.......

BINGO! We have a winner.

So which will work cheaper, the muzzies or the Mexicans?


30 posted on 01/09/2016 5:47:30 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

“Getting 200 new employees to do that kind of work wasn’t going to be easy.”..............

I am not a “union man” but you get what you pay for.


31 posted on 01/09/2016 5:48:35 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

“Getting 200 new employees to do that kind of work wasn’t going to be easy.”

No it wouldn’t be easy. Major chicken outlet by me and they cant fill the jobs at over $15 per hour. Good paying jobs for rural Wisconsin. Yet, you will hear them all complain while lined up at the food pantry. Or in the grocery store while using their food share card. We have raised a nation of wimps and whiners.


32 posted on 01/09/2016 5:56:48 AM PST by mouse1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mouse1

Absolutely correct....if one refuses an offered job his welfare should be stopped!!


33 posted on 01/09/2016 6:50:48 AM PST by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

Sorry, Mohammed, that position has been filled.

No, Adhmed, we’ve eliminated that position.

Thank you, Saed, we’ll keep your application right here in file 13.


34 posted on 01/09/2016 7:06:24 AM PST by bgill (CDC site, "We still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

Watch for the Cargill poisoned meat articles.


35 posted on 01/09/2016 7:12:16 AM PST by Old Yeller (Obama is winning the war on terror when you realize he is on the side of the enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Popman
Cargill didn't cave, they just being business prudent...

Go Trump Go. Someone has to protect us from these Politically Correct fools.

We have Catholic Schools building Prayer rooms and foot baths for these people, we have public schools in New York doing the same thing yet we can't wear a cross pendant or display a Bible near one of these places.

36 posted on 01/09/2016 12:22:41 PM PST by itsahoot (Anyone receiving a Woo! Woo! for President has never won anything after the award.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Popman
So saving that cost is business prudent...

Business Prudent is not hiring these scum in the first place.

37 posted on 01/09/2016 12:24:54 PM PST by itsahoot (Anyone receiving a Woo! Woo! for President has never won anything after the award.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

-—Business Prudent is not hiring these scum in the first place.——

Not going to disagree... but that barn door is already opened...

It can be very expensive to close...

I’ve made my share of “bad hires” over the years...

The really smart ones can cling and hang on for years knowing how to work the system...

A termination can be a very expensive move, if you fire a real asshole...


38 posted on 01/09/2016 12:33:24 PM PST by Popman (Christ alone: My Cornerstone...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist
My understanding regarding religious accommodation in the workplace is that any employer with at least 15 employees is subject to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Whether they should be or not is a whole other topic.

However, the key word is "reasonable accommodation". What I've read of this case, "11 Somali (Muslim) workers in one part of the plant all wanted to pray at once during the second shift. Normally, the company allows only one to three to go at a time during a shift so as not to interfere with meat production."

Cargill allowed prayer breaks and even "has long had two "reflection rooms," where Muslim workers can take short, usually 5-minute, prayer breaks." I wonder if they would provide chapels with Holy Water Fonts for Catholics or separate "reflection rooms" for Jews, Hindus and Pastafarians? /s

Not allowing 11 workers working on the same shift and the same production line to all take a prayer break at the very same time does not seem unreasonable as it would IMO fall under and "would pose an undue hardship" to the company. See numbers 6 through 9:

http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/qanda_religion.html

But the 150 who were fired were not as I understand extended past the 11, nor were they fired for requesting a reasonable accommodation for prayer break(s) nor for complaining over the policy, they just failed to show up for work for three days which is grounds for termination.

Where I work a no-call, no-show for even one day, unless there are extenuating circumstances such as the employee was in an accident or hospitalized and too ill to call off (and yes we even had one who was arrested and in jail for a DUI, but on a weekend when he was not scheduled to work FWIW) is grounds for termination. A no-call, no-show for three days is considered job abandonment and a "voluntary" resignation. We have a policy were anyone terminated for job abandonment is not eligible for re-hire in 30 days or in 180 days but EVER!

39 posted on 01/09/2016 12:45:53 PM PST by MD Expat in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist
Once again, sorry for the weird symbols. This is unfortunate.

Use this:

http://dan.hersam.com/tools/smart-quotes.html

Copy and paste and then "Convert" and paste the converted text. An extra step which should not be necessary but until this is fixed, works great.

40 posted on 01/09/2016 12:48:21 PM PST by MD Expat in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson