Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: palmer

[[Two possibilities: classified document illegally redacted. Or unclassified document with no need to redact an “identifying heading”.]]

Yep- she’s gonna weasel out of this somehow- Was thinking today IF there is no ‘electronic trail’ of her aid actually sending that info- then all she will have to say is “Nah- We never actually did it, I was just thinking out loud in my email to him trying to find a way to expedite the issue, , and thinking better of it later phoned him to say he shouldn’t do that” or some such lie- You watch, she wil l skate on this one too UNLESS there is an electronic trail


23 posted on 01/08/2016 8:14:36 PM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Bob434
The State Department has said it has been unable to find any evidence that the document in question was emailed to Clinton. The fact that it was meant to be sent through a secure fax does not necessarily mean that it was classified, the agency said.

http://news.yahoo.com/clinton-says-she-did-not-classified-information-email-173622785.html

So they are covering her either way. They won't release any classified emails so we won't see any evidence if the doc was classified. Then she can lie like you point out. Or State Dept will show us an unclassified email and say this was the one she was referring to.

56 posted on 01/10/2016 4:41:31 PM PST by palmer (Net "neutrality" = Obama turning the internet over to foreign enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson