Posted on 01/08/2016 10:01:09 AM PST by Trumpinator
Edited on 01/08/2016 10:26:14 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Two people with ties to the Islamic State have been arrested on terrorism-related charges in California and Texas, authorities said Thursday.
They include a refugee from Syria who is charged with lying to federal investigators about his travels to the civil war in that country.
(Excerpt) Read more at cleveland.com ...
This country under the leadership of both of the parties: the dems and the GOPe, is so bad this land is not going to survive.
Now the donkey in charge wants to remove guns from the law abiding. Once that happens, turn out the lights.
He reveals right there in his reasoning why he should not have been allowed in.
His opposition to ISIS is because they kill fellow Muslims. Many Muslims only hate ISIS for that reason. That’s the problem.
No more Muslim immigration.
May seem extreme. But it will save lives.
The law already can apply to advocates of Sharia Law:
Legal Bar on Naturalization for Communist or Totalitarian Party Members
The Immigration and Nationality Act (I.N.A.) contains a prohibition on naturalization for anyone involved, within the last ten years, with a group that advocates or teaches opposition to all organized government; or involved with the Communist Party or any other totalitarian party of the U.S. or any foreign state; or who advocates world communism or totalitarian dictatorship even without formal group membership. (See I.N.A. Section 313.)
The law similarly blocks naturalization for anyone who within the last ten years, individually or as part of any organization, advocates or teaches the forceful or violent overthrow of the U.S. government, assaults or murders any government officer, damages, injures, or destroys property, or commits sabotage.
It’s perfectly legal and reasonable.
Muslims have a conflict of interest when it comes to upholding the Constitution.
No other major religion has this conflict of interest, nor lack of religion.
Always remember Ben Carson was the first to stand firm on this aspect of Islam and it’s inherent conflict if interest with being loyal to the Constitution.
I of course would be happy with zero Muslims in America but it would be a good start to treat Sharia on the same level as Communists and other totalitarian belief systems.
There is no constitutional hurdle.
I agree. I meant within the immigration statute.
The King wants to house refugees at Travis AFB where the military isn’t allowed to carry. Sound sane to you?
Of course the “refugees” include ISIS members. This is common knowledge. So why were they admitted?
How is that “diversity” working out these days? Remind me, what exactly is it that we need these people for?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.