“The Act also establishes the United States citizenship of certain children of citizens, born abroad, without the need for naturalization:”
Citizenship is not the question. The issue is meeting the requirements of “Natural Born Citizenship.” The USSC clearly answered this issue (of what a Natural Born Citizen was) in Minor v Happersatt.)
Obama, with his foreign citizen father, clearly did not meet the Article II standard. He, they used “Jus Solis” as a “work around.” The damage Obama has done (and is doing) to the US, illustrates the Wisdom of the Founders when they wrote Article II limiting the Presidency to those born and raised as Americans exclusively.
For the Democrats redefining NBC to merely “Jus Solis” helped them get Obama past Article II. Foolishly the RNC let them get away with it. As a side benefit for the Democrats it has help them establishes the children of illegal aliens, “anchor babies” as citizens.
Try telling the American Kennel Club that your mongrel, who was born in a French Poodle kennel, is therefore a “Poodle.
Won’t Fly will it? Neither should have Obama, a born mutt!
Poodles born to Poodle parents are Poodles. Period.
As for Cruz, if both his parents were American Citizens he is for all intents and purposes, not only a citizen, but also a NBC. While born just across the border in Alberta, Canada, Cruz was raised in American, to American culture, values,and mores. Nothing “foreign” about him.
Obama, born of an American mother was never raised an American (or for that matter in America).
Cruz, born of an American mother and father, was raised not only as an American, but as a highly Patriotic American, meeting the Founders intent as expressed in Article II.
His father wasn’t an American or an American citizen when Cruz was born. I don’t believe the wording means two parents, but that an American citizen mom is enough. Just saying...