Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Team Obama Joins Donald Trump’s Attack On Ted Cruz’s Citizenship
Breitbart ^

Posted on 01/06/2016 12:14:41 PM PST by springwater13

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-209 next last
To: butterdezillion

That would be wild if they did.

The Obama administration already knows something about Cruz since they do have access to federal records whether it strengthens their case or weakens it.


81 posted on 01/06/2016 12:56:11 PM PST by Red Steel (Ted Cruz: 'I'm a Big Fan of Donald Trump')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

My usual position is tell the truth & shame the devil. Cruz would have needed to document his citizenship status to get his passport, ss card etc. The documentation exists and he could lay this to rest by being straightforward. He is a deep strategist and may be planning to let the opposition dig a hole for themselves and catch them wrong footed by having proof of citizenship at birth. We will have to wait and see.


82 posted on 01/06/2016 12:58:41 PM PST by JayGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
Trump and Cruz should work together on Trump filing a lawsuit challenging Cruz's eligibility...

So you want Cruz to sue himself claiming he's Constitutionally ineligible to be president? Well...I suppose he would have standing. </sarcasm>

83 posted on 01/06/2016 12:58:45 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
"it's been cleared up to everyone but morons."

You honestly believe the Dems wouldn't make an issue of this if Ted became the nominee?

This is fair game for Trump and a wise move on his part.

84 posted on 01/06/2016 12:59:21 PM PST by GonzoII ("If the new crime be, to believe in God, let us all be criminals" -Sheen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: yadent
If Cruz is the nominee, the Dims will use this issue with FORCE.

Because after all it worked so well against Obama. </sarcasm>

85 posted on 01/06/2016 12:59:50 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Fair game, but not gonna change a damned vote.


86 posted on 01/06/2016 1:03:06 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright (WTF? How Karl Rove and the Establishment Lost...Again (Amazon Best Seller))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Glad I’m not the only one here thinking like this. If they do sue Cruz, it will be interesting how judges are going to judge based on the fact they let Obongo set precedent.

This will be a huge mistake if they take this road.


87 posted on 01/06/2016 1:04:32 PM PST by Patriot Babe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: JayGalt

If you are from a scientific background as you say....then you should be asking “why” and not just “what” and so on. For example, do you know WHY the NBC clause is even included in the Founding Docs?

When you ask and answer that question, you’ll have your answer.


88 posted on 01/06/2016 1:04:49 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright (WTF? How Karl Rove and the Establishment Lost...Again (Amazon Best Seller))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: jacquej

Rubio and Cruz both have family history issues. Ted’s father is a odd one. He shows up in Texas. The college provides a social security card for him and he works while on a visa as a student. Very shady. Students had to have money and couldn’t work usually when under such conditions on having a student visa. This will come out more and more.


89 posted on 01/06/2016 1:05:14 PM PST by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: JayGalt

Cruz doesn’t need to prove anything. Better to take the high road and let someone try and prove he’s ineligible. Giving in and responding to this crack-pot charge will only leave him open for even crazier charges which he will then be expected to prove wrong.


90 posted on 01/06/2016 1:08:15 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

I have read extensively on this issue because I really hoped we could avoid Obama. Rather than attacking my understanding why not ask why you need to settle this without having the facts.


91 posted on 01/06/2016 1:08:44 PM PST by JayGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Obama is black and had more than enough cover as a protected class, more-so than a white female....Cruz the Republican will be afforded no such status.


92 posted on 01/06/2016 1:09:12 PM PST by yadent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: yadent
On issues such as this Dims play hard and dirty.

The Democrats don't need to do anything on this. They have Trump.

93 posted on 01/06/2016 1:09:14 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Maybe you are right. Its certainly the path Obama took and it worked for him. Cruz certainly has the grit to take that road.


94 posted on 01/06/2016 1:10:12 PM PST by JayGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: JayGalt

Dude, it is settled - your pathetic attempt to “settle it” in the minds that have decided they are NEVER going to be settled is just a farce.

And I notice you couldn’t address why the Founders put it in....which is important, because their INTENT is far far far more scientifically specific than their definition.

Try that Mr. Wizard.


95 posted on 01/06/2016 1:10:43 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright (WTF? How Karl Rove and the Establishment Lost...Again (Amazon Best Seller))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46
Trump has not attacked Ted Cruz. All he said was, he didn’t know if the attacks an Ted Cruz’s citizenship held any water.

And the front runner making a statement like this is just out of benevolence 8^ )

96 posted on 01/06/2016 1:10:50 PM PST by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

Would Republican talking points work better?


97 posted on 01/06/2016 1:12:30 PM PST by showme_the_Glory ((ILLEGAL: prohibited by law. ALIEN: Owing political allegiance to another country or government))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

No, they have the Republican Party.....


98 posted on 01/06/2016 1:18:56 PM PST by yadent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

Ha Ha Ha, my best laugh of the day. In the past 8 years, and even before Obama, essays & multiple legal opinions about this topic have been written, including case law in the years after the Constitution was written.

There is laborious documentation attempting to tease the purpose and thought process of the Founders based on their correspondence with context including the laws of other Nations at the time and historically but because I won’t regurgitate it to you I don’t know.
Faugh.


99 posted on 01/06/2016 1:22:52 PM PST by JayGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: yadent
No, they have the Republican Party.....

Them too.

100 posted on 01/06/2016 1:22:54 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-209 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson