Ted Cruz: Supreme Court Will Dismantle Second Amendment if Hillary Clinton Is Elected President

The Blaze ^ | Jan. 4, 2016 | Leigh Munsil

[JoSixChip]

And if Cruz is the nominee, Hillary is a lock.

You are probably right. But really it does not matter, they are both puppets for the one world order UN agenda controlled by big money. Evidenced by the CFG and GS funding both of them.

[JohnBovenmyer]

Ted didn’t realize Roberts would be blackmailed over his (technically illegally) adopted kids. I wonder whether Roberts’s was one of FBI raw files Hillary purloined.

[caww]

Have you ever considered the reason Trump is self-paying because he would not be able to get the donors???? There’s a reason why Trump’s ALWAYS the one donating to politicians and political charities rather than have his own “successful” Charities. Heck even the college he opened fell flat.

What does it matter who supports what candidates with donations?....they have that freedom and certainly we don’t want ONLY those of wealth to run for President. I have no problem with raising funds for a Politician to be able to have the revenues to win.

[JoSixChip]

Cruz will take Hillary down in debates, no question about it. He will win the general election.

That is flat out delusional. If Cruz were to somehow get the nomination, the msm would destroy Cruz to the point where even he would vote for hillary.

[vette6387]

“If you don’t like the ratings for any reason, please contact Conservative Review’s Editor-in-Chief, “The Great One,” Mark Levin.”

I don’t, and Mark Levin is just another loud-mouthed a$$hole whose 15 minutes of “fame” is about over. We should thank Trump for having exposed the likes of Mark Levin and others of his ilk! Go Trump!

[Secret Agent Man]

If that happens everyone here knows what that means.

[JoSixChip]

Have you ever considered the reason Trump is self-paying because he would not be able to get the donors

Well certainly not the CFG or GS, but I did donate to him.

What does it matter who supports what candidates with donations?

It maters when pliticians like Cruz and other GOPe members vote to flood the country with cheep labor and give away American sovereignty just so they can fund their next campaign.

[faithhopecharity]

1. any limitations or interferences with American citizens’ rights to keep and bear arms...are unconstitutional and will not be obeyed
2. anything the “president’ orders the American citizens to do or not to do...is not law... and will not be obeyed
3. on its face, it would not even pass a first-year-law-students’ examination for just writing a proper regulation or ‘law’. In The Business has a specific legal meaning... it cannot be redefined down to a single transaction .. even if attempted by congress and even if dealing with an otherwise constitutional subject for congressional action. O is childish, stupid about the most simple things in American law..... and it is amazing that he apparently doesn’t have any better-informed advisers (!?) too.
4. FUBO (or whatever your real name is)

[jpsb]

Ted didn't realize

What ever, Cruz was a big supporter of John Roberts. Epic fail. I do not think we need Cruz appointing more John Roberts to the Supreme Court.

[jpsb]

We should thank Trump for having exposed the likes of Mark Levin and others

BUMP!

[TexasRepublic]

The election of Clinton would require a revolution to retain our rights as surely as Lincolns election started the Civil War. A struggle is almost upon us and I am sick with dread.

[PGR88]

Cruz is absolutely correct.

[TBP]

The next president will get to nominate 2-4 justices. Choose carefully.

Trump points to his radical sister as a good justice, although he says he won’t appoint her. But is that an indication of the kind of justice he would appoint?

Remember, Warren, Brennan, Blackmun, Stevens, and Souter were all Republican-appointed justices. So it’s importnat to get the most consistently conservative and constitutionalist president we can.

[kygolfman]

If Cruz were to somehow get the nomination, the msm would destroy Cruz to the point where even he would vote for hillary.

---

So if Cruz “somehow” gets the nomination that means he beat Trump.
If Trump can’t beat Cruz how could possibly beat Hillary.

[JoSixChip]

So if Cruz “somehow” gets the nomination that means he beat Trump.

Sorry, I forgot the /s tag. But not to worry, that will never happen, no need to even contemplate it. Once Cruz voted for TPA and the corker bill in exchange for campaign dollars from CFG and GS, he became a non-issue. The only reason you are hearing about him in the news is the msm thinks they can derail Trump by using Cruz and his few supporters.

[SmokingJoe]

You are going to need to get off the drugs mate.
Not only will Ted Cruz win the nomination, he will CRUSH Hilary Clinton in the general election.
Cruz is currently either tied with or beating Hilary Clinton in the last 3 RCP polls. And that is despite the constant relentless attacks from the MSM starting before he even declared, and including a nasty hit piece from the New York Times the very day he declared. The MSM have been attacking Ted Cruz long, long , long before they wrote even one attack article against Trump, yet Cruz is beating Hilary Clinton in the latest matchups even as the twice divorced far left loudmouth liberal from New York is getting clobbered by Hilary in head to head matchups.

[SmokingJoe]

Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz on Monday warned voters that their Second Amendment rights are in jeopardy if they elect Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton this November.

Same thing can be said about Donald Trump, who thinks his pro abortion, far left sister is the kind of person who'd make an excellent US Supreme Court Justice.
Voting for Trump = another Justice Kagan or Sotomayor in the Supreme Court and disaster for this country.
Every conservative who values their freedom should NEVER vote for Trump.

[erod]

[Soul of the South]

“And n that , he is completely accurate . .as I think we All agree

We should also recognize a Republican president I’ll not necessarily make onservative appointments to the Court and a Republican Senate will not block liberal appointees to the Court.

Blackman, O’Conner, Souter, Robert, Warren were all appointed by GOP presidents. Only four Republican senators voted no on Ruth Bader Ginsberg.

[strings6459]

Half Free Republic and most of the country.