UNBELIEVABLE Update - Oregon "Bundy Militia" Standoff - The Federal Prosecutor...

CTH ^ | January 4, 2016 | by sundance

[combat_boots]

You think they’ll take over the Hammond home as an education center?

It’s good to be king of the hill.

There is a gofundme for the Hammonds-until that outfit ‘cancels’ it-for the sake of the Borg.

[MarMema]

http://www.fws.gov/nwrs/threecolumn.aspx?id=2147572606

[TigersEye]

Happy New Year to you and yours, dadfly. May you all be safe and strong.

[MileHi]

But while the Hammond family has been abused, targeted for unjust actions and prosecution and been sent back to jail after serving their prescribed time the US Department of Justice has released thousands of murderers, rapists and violent felons, sent terrorists back to the battlefield and even looked the other way rather than prosecute criminals who look like the president and the former attorney general.

You nailed that SO hard.

Kudos

[kiryandil]

Well, if a jury finds the law repugnant, isn't that defying the will of the elected officials who passed it, as is your gold standard regardless of the fact at hand? And in this case, didn't the judge practice a sort of nullification?

The Feds find their own laws repugnant, some of the time. So they don't enforce them.

Peasants, on the other hand, get the 900 pound angry retarded troll treatment.

The US Department of Justice practiced nullification when it came to Bill Clinton, Lois Lerner, Jon Corzine, Charlie Rangel, its own boss Eric "Dick" Holder and others.

And the entire 0Muslim administration is practising nullification with the immigration laws.

[Las Vegas Ron]

Well guess what guys...all of that rah rah “tough on crime” internet posturing can come back to bite you.

One is Constitutional, the other is not.

When you can justify government ownership and control of land other then specified in the Constitution which this land is clearly not, then you'll have a valid point.

[combat_boots]

Hmmm. Are the Hammonds Tea Partiers/conservatives?

I can find nothing on them.

[semimojo]

Well, if a jury finds the law repugnant, isn't that defying the will of the elected officials who passed it, as is your gold standard regardless of the fact at hand? And in this case, didn't the judge practice a sort of nullification?

Jurys don't generally nullify because they don't like the law but because they don't like the application of the law in a particular case. Besides, it isn't about "defying the will", which jury nullification may or may not do, it's about defying the written law which jury nullification doesn't.

No matter, the jury didn't object here and found the Hammonds guilty.

A judge, who is an officer of the court, ignoring a law is a completely different animal than jury nullification.

[Georgia Girl 2]

Where were the two severely conservative senators Cruz and Rubio all this time?

[Lurker]

She has an address. Just saying.

L

[kiryandil]

I can find nothing on them.

Well, the federal persecutor did.

I read, finally, that they were "poaching", and "committed arson" to "cover it up".

And then the feral persecutor went into The Big Book of Laws to "find" that they'd "committed terrorism".

Think about that. Ranchers "poaching".

Ranchers shoot vermin all the time. And they had scads of acres to roam around on. Did they need to "poach" because they didn't have enough beef?

[sport]

while those who soar unhampered over the peaks of freedom suddenly lose the taste for freedom, lose the will to defend it, and, hopelessly confused and lost, almost begin to crave slavery”.

That phrase right there describes the people of the united States to a Tee. I have never seen a more slave mentality then most of the population show.

[combat_boots]

Probably eating these steaks:

BLM Strikes Again, Sets Fire to Ranches in July Kills 80 head of Cattle

PushBack Now I December 5, 2015 I Ammon Bundy

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3369785/posts?page=21

I know. It’s mean. They’re both feds, though. Most of the candidates are and won’t bite the hand that feeds them; scratch, maybe-bite, no.

[Las Vegas Ron]

Jurys don't generally nullify because they don't like the law but because they don't like the application of the law in a particular case.

And you know that how?

Juries are the final check on unjust law, the peoples have the final say.

That is why there is such a thing as jury nullification.

[MarMema]

Right. So incredible it only shows how desperate their need to lie is becoming.

[MileHi]

Peasants, on the other hand, get the 900 pound angry retarded troll treatment.

And that is this case, soup to nuts. Seriously? Terrorism? 5 years? For normal ranching practices?

These are salt of the earth folks. The FedGov wouldn't even have this great "wild life refuge" if the ranchers families hadn't groomed it for cattle since before there was a BLM.

Oh, and where is all the heavy handed enforcement in Colorado where the same FedGov polluted the river in three states?

[SunTzuWu]

Bookmark.

[kiryandil]

So, I checked it out.

They were accused of "poaching" deer.

It sounds like something city folk would say, bless their hearts.

Deer are rats with hooves.

So, the gruberment thinks that Bambi got shot out of season, or whatever. On a ranch, where the deer are competing with beeves for forage. Oh. My. God.

[kiryandil]

Oh, and where is all the heavy handed enforcement in Colorado where the same FedGov polluted the river in three states?

Well, the 900 pound angry retarded troll was on vacation that week. I'm sure he would had dished out the normal treatment, if only he'd been on duty!

Drat the luck!

[MarMema]

Scroll down to the orange map.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/01/04/the-oregon-occupiers-complaint-explained-in-9-maps/?tid=sm_tw