Double jeopardy applies only to the guilt/innocence phase of a trial.
So they were found guilty of ____ arson?
But now they are more guilty of ___ terrorism?
I still don’t get how this can happen legally.
You are prosecuted and convicted for a crime and then sentenced for a different crime?
Why can’t we then take people who have been convicted of, say armed robbery, and done time ... and then add on to their sentence for terrorism?
I never mentioned double jeopardy.