Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Above My Pay Grade

It wasn’t arson. It was a Back Burn.


27 posted on 01/04/2016 6:21:02 AM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: massgopguy

A properly run proscribed burn doesn’t “destroy property” either.


28 posted on 01/04/2016 6:28:07 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: massgopguy

Witnesses testified that one of the fires was set by the son to cover up illegal deer slaughter and they then called BLM to falsely report that a “controlled burn” had gotten out of control.

The other back fire was set illegally during a period where there was a ban on such fires due to conditions that made them unsafe.


29 posted on 01/04/2016 6:38:24 AM PST by Above My Pay Grade (Donald Trump: New York City Liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson