Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RoosterRedux

Islam is not compatible with western societies, end of discussion. It is like the left ideology we are determined to change you whether you like it or not.


3 posted on 01/01/2016 5:07:27 AM PST by ronnie raygun (If we dont stand we will fall hard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ronnie raygun

‘zackly.
They do not belong in the West.


12 posted on 01/01/2016 6:15:10 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ronnie raygun
Islam is not compatible with western societies, end of discussion.

You nailed it. We have nearly 1400 years of history by which to judge Islam, and every minute of that time testifies to the fact you stated. For further reference, see this cartoon (somebody posted the link the other day, but it seems to apply to this discussion).
16 posted on 01/01/2016 6:22:17 AM PST by Montana_Sam (Truth lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ronnie raygun
Islam is not compatible with western societies, end of discussion.

Islam is not compatible with human civilization.

18 posted on 01/01/2016 6:31:30 AM PST by P-Marlowe (Tagline pending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ronnie raygun
Is current mainstream Islam incompatible with Western Civilization? Of course. But this book tries to argue that there was a time when a literalist school of Islam (the Asharites) and a liberal school of Islam (the Mutazilites) were equally strong, and if the Mutazilites had won (they lost), Islam would not be so barbarian.

The West has to stop trying to impose democracy on the Muslim countries because that can only lead to disaster (see Egypt). But perhaps some enlightened middle-eastern rulers (King Abdallah of Jordan, for example) could try to slowly build an intellectual base for a less barbarian form of Islam.

The solution of the problem of Islam cannot be purely political because politics is always based on intellectual/spiritual ideas. I think secular leaders of middle-eastern countries in the second half of the 20th century made a big mistake. They neglected Islam because they thought Islam would gradually disappear instead of trying to cultivate a form of Islam which is compatible with modern world. Of course, they could not avoid this mistake - they were mostly socialists (But I do not know why middle-eastern monarchs, who were not socialists, could not see the potential for the jihadi wave)

My conclusion is there are three possible scenarios: 1. To destroy Islam militarily. 2. To lose and see the end of civilization on earth. 3. To help the civilized minority among Muslims create an intellectual base for civilizing Islam.

27 posted on 01/01/2016 6:58:42 AM PST by Czech_Occidentalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson