Not seeing a major problem here.
They are complying with the law concerning open carry and posting the appropriate signage. This is their right as property owners.. Concealed carry is not prohibited.
I see a whole crapload of Gibber Jabber on this forum about individual property rights, but when a property owner exercise their rights concerning open carry, those same people go bat$h!t.
I understand why they did this-it is not their fight to “educate” the idiots out there concerning the 2nd Amendment by going through the BS the liberals are going to cause with false reports if they allow open carry. They have decided to be discreet.
The education part is left to the proponents.
They always have the option of changing when the population becomes educated.
The real solution is to make those signs meaningless by removing ANY penalties and prohibiting any trespass violations.
If a business like a market is open to the public then, as a matter of law, the sign should be made meaningless.
LOL! Like I said, their property, they can make the rules for said property. Kind of like restaurants and bars being able to make their own descisions about smoking in their estab.............. Oh, guess not in that case. Weird how that works. Yeah, it is bizarro world.
No we go bat$h!t when a baker can not refuse to cater a homo fake wedding. Or a deli is forced to serve halal sandwiches, but then the property rights you claim to support only applies when it supports evil.
It is a private business. They have the right to set the rules such as no shirt, no shoes, no service. Those who do not like it do not have to patronize the business. I would go elsewhere.
Unfortunately, the long arm of the government does not allow a private business to allow smoking if the patrons want it. As a non-smoker, I would no go there. But the should have the right. It is a bad product but it is still a legal product.