Link goes to Time Magazine:
http://science.time.com/2013/06/06/sorry-a-time-magazine-cover-did-not-predict-a-coming-ice-age/
If this hotlink works, the actual cover should be below:
Posted on 12/26/2015 9:54:31 PM PST by Tennessean4Bush
Ping for later
The real problem is the tendency to believe lies.
This is something that is within the realm of human will. No amount of truth telling, as long as lies can exist, will force people to actually grasp the truth.
The propensity to believe lies can be so bad that it even warps “science” which is supposed to be the most sacrosanct honest thing in the secular world.
The answer to lies is belief in God. What? some say! How can you get truth out of a sky pixie? Well, that presumption can be blown to smithereens to start; even if God were a pixie he wouldn’t just be a sky pixie, he would be an everywhere pixie. But he seems to do some very un-pixie-like things. Like hold the universe together. And care about what humans care about even though they don’t understand the universe.
I think this is the same van Biezen who created these YouTube videos to teach math and physics:
https://www.youtube.com/user/ilectureonline
Obviously, the man hates science.
Talk about colossal boners.
Well it depends on what you mean by science.
The position the field has gotten into today, deserves to be hated. It can’t rise above truth, and yet it has managed to arrogate to do just that.
To believe man-made global warming, you have to wonder what caused past ice ages and warming when we were not here or able to cause it.
Link goes to Time Magazine:
http://science.time.com/2013/06/06/sorry-a-time-magazine-cover-did-not-predict-a-coming-ice-age/
If this hotlink works, the actual cover should be below:
The EPA banned over the counter asthma inhalers.
And sometimes when I feel particularly philosophically masochistic, I ponder what this really would mean.
It’s easier to understand, granted, now that I have come into a better sense of faith, and realize that in fact it is something that is driven from without, from that so called “sky pixie.” I don’t generate it; I only choose to receive it.
It was something at least this bad: God had promised to fill them in on everything they needed to know. And the serpent? He said no, you can control all that. Just eat this fruit (of whatever nature, I am inclined to think it was a symbol for faith in the demonic) and poof, the world is yours.
Well there IS no such poof. It would be impossible! We are finite. We can’t contain that information so how could we possibly possess it, and this is just looking at it from the most obvious perspective.
Humble yourself under the mighty hand of God, and He will raise you up... makes a lot more sense now that I’ve seen what NOT doing that is like.
And, the global warming fiasco is just this, writ small. Vastly too much data to grasp, but that doesn’t daunt the slyentists. They proudly proclaim that what they have managed to grasp, or pretend to grasp, is what matters.
Ooh, spiritual history repeats itself. Not just physical history.
Some of us remember back in the mid-70’s when the climate boogeyman was that we were in for a new ice age. Then somehow 20 years later, we were to expect the exact opposite. When enough people started calling “them” out on their gross inconsistency, then they changed it to “climate change”. Yeah, yeah, that’s what it is!
It’s a con game waiting to be called.
Fast forward 20 years later, well before I heard of something called the internet, my wife and I stayed at a Bed & Breakfast in Ferndale, CA where we met a left-wing couple who piously bashed those who didn't believe in global warming. I'm assuming they thought we were birds of a feather. I still remember my response to this day. I simply said virtually word for word what I said in a previous post and have been saying since.
I purposely used the phrase "the coming ice age" because I remember that issue of TIME magazing.
I can understand why TIME magazine would want to revise its own history to send that issue down the memory hole but I won't comply.
Believe what thou wilt. I remember it.
Bump for lass rebuttal.
concider what we know- The atmosphere has 0.04% CO2 from ALL sources, man and natural combined
Man is responsible for just 3.4% of the 0.04% amount
Meaning the amount of CO2 In the atmosphere comprises just 0.00136% of the atmosphere
0.00136% of the atmosphere is completely incapable of capturing enough heat to cause ANY kind of change in the climate- period-
This should be the end of the story- This fact alone is the nail in the coffin for the lie called ‘man-caused climate change’
to put this in perspective- How little CO2 is in the atmosphere- consider an indoor football stadium- with it’s many 1000’s of seats. Now picture just one of those seats among the many 1000’s representing CO2 in the atmosphere- Just one seat- that’s it! Now put a candle on that seat, and let it burn- there is no way on earth that one candle I n that stadium is going to cause ‘catastrophic rise in temperature’ inside that stadium- Yet that is precisely what the climate alarmists are suggesting when they claim man’s CO2 is causing climate change-
They NEVER mention the amount of CO2 I n the atmosphere caused by man because they KNOW that IF they reveal how little there is, we would laugh them out of the business - 0.00136% of our atmosphere is such a small % that it’s shameful that alarmists are even claiming man is the cause of climate change-.
Think about it- 99.99864% of the atmosphere has NO CO2 in it that man produces- There is nothing in our atmosphere to stop heat from leaving- there is no thick blanket of CO2 like the alarmists would have you believe
Man can’t possibly be changing the climate- it’s impossible
Even if we were to multiply our output of CO2 a 1000 times from our current output- it still would not be enough to do anything regarding the climate
Another inconvenient truth which is devastating to climate change alarmist’s lie is that CO2 does NOT rise first- it rises 800 years AFTER temperatures rise- this is proven out by ice core samples- so the lie that CO2 causes warming is disproven by this FACT
Another inconvenient truth is that despite rising CO2 levels over the last 2 decades, temperatures have remained flat- so the lie that CO2 causes warming is disproven by this FACT
good info!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.