I’m naive about constitutional law here like Obama is, but how do they wrangle around the constitution like this to charge this guy? To me this is like charging someone with a crime for practicing freedom of speech. What legal logic are they using here in infringe upon the 2nd amendment even though the amendment is specifically clear that it shall NOT be infringed? Are they using Clintonian methodology by redefining words here? “It depends what the meaning of the word “not” is”? Maybe they redefined it as a non-word? It doesn’t exist? To me this guy is a political prisoner put there by treasonists because the government has no legal maneuver I can think of where they get to decide which constitutional rights you can or cannot have. The constitution is not THEIRS. They are servants to the people and as far as I know they people haven’t repealed the 2nd Amendment, and that this guy was merely hunting makes it all the more obscene. These oath of office breaking traitors have no problem importing Islamo-Nazis from Syria, but a guy hunting gets locked up? WTF?
released for $6K. Can’t be a very big deal.