Charles Lane said that comparing Jimmy Carter's cutting off Iranian immigration and the deportation of Iranians to what Trump proposes is apples and oranges. Iran was a nation state while Islam is a religion. Lane admits that the President has the constitutional authority to do so.
A better comparison would be our refusal to admit members of the communist party, current or former, to the US. Communism is an ideology and quasi religion. The big question is whether Islam is compatible with the Constitution and Western values. Sharia law, the treatment of women, the lack of separation between religion and the state are all tenets of Islam that make it incompatible with our values. Will Muslims who enter the US renounce such views and pledge their total allegiance to this country? If not, then they should not be admitted.
Great post but in truth you just touched the tip of the iceberg of all the fallacies and problems with Islam it’s just a never ending nightmare
Hannity had one muslim man who spoke out and he was fired from his job and has death threats on him. The muslims aren’t speaking out and will not speak out.. they know how to silence their own and us.
They don’t come here to assimilate.. they come here to dominate this country... world domination... and their goals are the 2 countries who they believe are their worst enemies and must be done away with.. Israel and the United States. After they take care of these 2.. the rest will be theirs by default.
The few who want freedom, are the Christians, and obama is not letting them in.. 1 - 236 is the last ratio I heard.
The next President is probably the one thing we have to hope for... get the wrong in there and we are gone. My grandchildren will not know a life I had if the left gets that power. We are so close to being gone anyway... hanging by the proverbial thread.