Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Foolish PC Suppression of Public Concerns Fuels the Trump Phenomenon
National Review ^ | 12/10/2015 | Victor Davis Hanson

Posted on 12/10/2015 7:23:08 AM PST by SeekAndFind

The more analysts try to figure out Donald Trump's appeal, the more they sound baffled.

Pundits cite Trump's verbal sloppiness and ridiculousness as proof that he must soon implode. But Trump sees his daily bombast as an injection of outrage for a constituency now hooked on someone who finally voices their pent-up anger. The more reckless Trump's doses of scattergun outrageousness, the better the fix for his supporters.

Trump's vague "make America great again” was the natural bookend to Barack Obama's even more vacuous “hope and change.” The popularity of such empty slogans reflects a culture in which no one any longer trusts institutions, the media, government, or politicians.

The public no longer respects U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the IRS, the VA, or the GSA. Even the once-hallowed Secret Service has become a near laughingstock of incompetency, corruption, and politicization. Is the purpose of NASA really Muslim outreach, as NASA chief Charles Bolden suggested in 2010?

The world that we are told about by our government bears no resemblance to what we see and hear every day.

President Obama has exacerbated this current disconnect between the public and its officials. In unserious fashion, he shares his selfies, parades his annual Final Four picks, and jets off to Los Angeles to appear on late-night talk shows, even as he hectors Americans in sermons about their Islamophobia, their carbon footprints, their immigration xenophobia, and their gun obsessions.

Did the public earn such presidential rebukes because it believes that jihadism at home and the Islamic State abroad are more dangerous than global warming? Or because disarming law-abiding citizens will not prevent law-breaking criminals and terrorists from obtaining illegal weapons? Or because it is unwise to open the borders to anyone who can make it into the United States, few questions asked?

The first reaction of Attorney General Loretta Lynch after the recent San Bernardino terrorist attack was to warn the country about Islamophobia. Her implicit message to the families of the dead was not that the government missed a terrorist cadre or let Islamic State sympathizers carry out a massacre. Instead, she worried more about Americans being angry at the inability of the tight-knit Muslim community to ferret out the extremists in its midst.

So we live in an age of disbelief.

The government reports that a record 94.4 million Americans are not in the labor force. That is almost a third of the country. How can the same government declare that the official unemployment rate is only 5 percent?

Economists warn that a $20 trillion national debt cannot be serviced without major calamities once interest rates rise. Yet even as interest rates are scheduled to go up, the government still borrows nearly $500 billion a year. It calls that profligacy fiscal prudence, because the borrowing is below the usual $1 trillion a year.

It may or may not have been wise for the Supreme Court to sanction gay marriage, or for the Pentagon to allow women in the military to join all combat units, or for the president to tacitly end border enforcement.

But these changes were not made by majority legislative decision. And they have come thick and fast without time for the public to digest their consequences. Instead, if a new idea or agenda lacks majority support, then activists can confidently look for a court or bureaucracy to implement change by top-down order.

In short, millions of citizens think the nation is headed for a financial reckoning. They feel threatened by radical Islamic terrorism. They sense that cultural and social stability has disappeared. And they know that expression of these worries can be a thought crime -- hounded down by politicians, media, universities, and cultural institutions that do not enjoy broad public support and are not subject to the direct consequences of their own ideologies.

Amid these crises and the present absence of responsible leadership, if there were not a demagogic Donald Trump ranting and raving on the scene, the country would probably have to invent something like him.

-- NRO contributor Victor Davis Hanson is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution and the author, most recently, of The Savior Generals.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: elections; immigration; islam; nationalrino; pc; terrorism; trump; trumpwasright

1 posted on 12/10/2015 7:23:08 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
demagogic Donald Trump ranting and raving

I really don't care at all what Trump sounds like. I care that his policies are ones which I can support. His speech may not be mellifluous like the dulcet tones of BHO or the pleasant screeches of HRC, but what he is saying is what most Americans want to hear.

2 posted on 12/10/2015 7:34:14 AM PST by Blennos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blennos

I still like “Married with Children”. On TV’s PC world, not a single show with same level of non-PC jokes.


3 posted on 12/10/2015 7:38:54 AM PST by jennychase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jennychase

Even reruns of Married, With Children are now being subjected to PC editing I see. Like the one where Al negatively reacts when that guy wins the Lotto “after just three days in the country”.


4 posted on 12/10/2015 7:41:09 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Blennos

Hanson is a serious analyst of history. He sees what is happening. Trump is a demagogue, but it may be what the country needs at the moment, and that seems to be what Hanson is saying.


5 posted on 12/10/2015 7:45:04 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Hanson is a serious analyst of history. He sees what is happening. Trump is a demagogue, but it may be what the country needs at the moment, and that seems to be what Hanson is saying.

I know Hanson and his books quite well. I repect him. I simply do not agree with him on his calling Trump a demagogue.

The definition of a demagogue is "rabble-rouser... a political leader in a democracy who appeals to the emotions, fears, prejudices, and ignorance of the lower socioeconomic classes in order to gain power and promote political motives." ((from Wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demagogue))

I do not feel that Trump is appealing to my prejudices and ignorance. I feel he is stating positions which are quite logical and forthright. He might not state them in a way to appeal to the so-called media or political elite, but what he is saying is basically honest and correct.

6 posted on 12/10/2015 8:03:53 AM PST by Blennos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Blennos

You have a valid point. I agree that Trump is actually appealing to common sense concerns.

It “feels” like demagogery because the media cartel has suppressed these ideas so successfully.


7 posted on 12/10/2015 8:14:51 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m still not sold on Trump doing what he says he will do but I am elated to see him cause apoplectic fits among the establishment politicians and insane reactionary mayhem among the media.

The political pendulum always (eventually) swings equally as far in the opposite direction; this tumult is good for the nation.


8 posted on 12/10/2015 8:29:27 AM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
In short, millions of citizens think the nation is headed for a financial reckoning. They feel threatened by radical Islamic terrorism. They sense that cultural and social stability has disappeared. And they know that expression of these worries can be a thought crime -- hounded down by politicians, media, universities, and cultural institutions that do not enjoy broad public support and are not subject to the direct consequences of their own ideologies.

My hope is that PC implodes as a result of Trump's courage to speak out.

9 posted on 12/10/2015 8:33:09 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Hanson is a serious analyst of history. He sees what is happening. Trump is a demagogue, but it may be what the country needs at the moment, and that seems to be what Hanson is saying.

"Sometimes, there's a man, well, he's the man for his time and place."

10 posted on 12/10/2015 8:34:06 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Trump is smashing the political correctness in this country and I love it.


11 posted on 12/10/2015 10:15:37 AM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson